Brontoforumus Archive

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:


This board has been fossilized.
You are reading an archive of Brontoforumus, a.k.a. The Worst Forums Ever, from 2008 to early 2014.  Registration and posting (for most members) has been disabled here to discourage spambots from taking over.  Old members can still log in to view boards, PMs, etc.

The new message board is at http://brontoforum.us.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15

Author Topic: Thing4 (Playing Thread)  (Read 11823 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Friday

  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65374
  • Posts: 5122
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #80 on: October 15, 2012, 05:27:48 PM »

But you know that the ranks of The Thing have increased.

B-, good atmosphere!  keep it up  :advice:

Kazz is found, hung by his own entrails. A note is clipped to his shirt:

"lol idk my bff jill?"

Kazz was the Grammar Nazi.

EDIT:

<Esperath> PS I really hope Kazz goes Grammar Nazi on your post
<Esperath> http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2005/hanged-or-hung/
<Friday> ohhhhhhhhhhh shiiiiiiii
Logged

Sharkey

  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65511
  • Posts: 1017
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #81 on: October 15, 2012, 06:13:01 PM »

2012-10-14 00:59:44< Sharkey> Except if I don't dynamite kazz first thing tomorrow, it means I've been turned.
2012-10-14 00:59:49< Sharkey> Or I changed my mind.
2012-10-14 00:59:53< Sharkey> Or I don't have dynamite.
2012-10-14 01:00:29< Sharkey> But seriously, burn him.
2012-10-14 01:00:39< Sharkey> just cus

Caith, if you actually read that it's a complete non-statement (i.e., a joke.)

I do kinda want to burn kazz, but I'll settle for just testing him. Not that I have anything against the guy. I just think he's funnier when he's on fire.

stupid goddamn not just murdering everybody for no reason mumblemumble etc
Logged

Destil

  • Robot Wrangler
  • Tested
  • Karma: 0
  • Posts: 17
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #82 on: October 15, 2012, 06:31:09 PM »

So are there out of game communication rules here? I would assume so, though I'd also assume that something like that wouldn't really count as a violation.

For now I'm waiting to see how the free test turns out; personally I'd be inclined to scan Friend as he seemed to be more interested in an easy test than anything (pushing for both the vote leader and the self-voter).
Logged

Sharkey

  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65511
  • Posts: 1017
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #83 on: October 15, 2012, 06:38:39 PM »

So are there out of game communication rules here? I would assume so, though I'd also assume that something like that wouldn't really count as a violation.

Yeah, that's why I asked. Nobody knew, so I made a smartass comment. Drunk fuckoffery while watching Baby Police wasn't exactly a strategy meeting. Unless I can vote for Baby Police to be nailed to a fucking cross made out of flamethrowers.

But for the sake of clarity, what are the rules on secret conspiracies or whatever?
Logged

gahitsu

  • Tested
  • Karma: 0
  • Posts: 156
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #84 on: October 15, 2012, 08:01:50 PM »

I'd assume we can talk about it outside of the thread? I mean, I hope so, 'cause that's the reason I play here and not on TT. It's a ... caustic mentality there, to say the least.
Logged

Lottel

  • You know that's right
  • Tested
  • Karma: 81
  • Posts: 3723
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #85 on: October 15, 2012, 08:56:32 PM »

Pretty sure as long as Friday gets a transcript,  it's cool.

Pretty sure.
Logged

Kazz

  • Projekt Direktor
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65475
  • Posts: 6423
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #86 on: October 16, 2012, 12:54:00 AM »

If you test me, I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
Logged

  • Magic Gunner Miss Blue
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65461
  • Posts: 4300
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #87 on: October 16, 2012, 02:50:55 AM »

D...Double Kazzing?
Logged

Friday

  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65374
  • Posts: 5122
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #88 on: October 16, 2012, 04:49:12 AM »

Yeah, outside communication is fine. You're free to talk in IRC, send other players PMs, etc.

Like Lottel said, just remember to send me the transcript.
Logged

Friend

  • Meow see here..
  • Tested
  • Karma: 4
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #89 on: October 16, 2012, 11:18:05 AM »

For now I'm waiting to see how the free test turns out; personally I'd be inclined to scan Friend as he seemed to be more interested in an easy test than anything (pushing for both the vote leader and the self-voter).

I can accept the vote leader point, but I don't think it's fair to hold the self-voter vote against me, because Ocksi voted for themself after I already voted for them. Also, I don't mind if you want to test me, but personally I feel like it's a waste of time since I know I'm innocent. I would rather vote for zaratustra based on nothing but my instinct.
Logged

Caithness

  • Hat Man
  • Tested
  • Karma: 8
  • Posts: 889
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #90 on: October 16, 2012, 11:54:26 AM »

Are you planning to use that test before time runs out, Lottel?
Logged

Zaratustra

  • what
  • Tested
  • Karma: 48
  • Posts: 3691
    • View Profile
    • Zaratustra Productions
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #91 on: October 16, 2012, 12:06:23 PM »

We have... 16 more hours I think.

Voting for Lottel until he uses that dang wire.

Lottel

  • You know that's right
  • Tested
  • Karma: 81
  • Posts: 3723
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #92 on: October 16, 2012, 03:10:43 PM »

I was actually waiting for input on who I should use it on.

But if that's not acceptable, I'll look over the thread again during dinner and think on who to test.
Logged

Caithness

  • Hat Man
  • Tested
  • Karma: 8
  • Posts: 889
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #93 on: October 16, 2012, 03:27:19 PM »

I already gave my input, I thought. I'm for using it on Sharkey.
Logged

Beat Bandit

  • be entranced by my sexy rhythm
  • High-Bullshit
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65418
  • Posts: 4293
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #94 on: October 16, 2012, 03:52:44 PM »

My input: test caithness.

Just because I would've totally turned the one proven innocent as my first action, were I a the thing. Don't think it's great reasoning, but it's out there if you can't decide.
Logged

Lottel

  • You know that's right
  • Tested
  • Karma: 81
  • Posts: 3723
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #95 on: October 16, 2012, 04:11:28 PM »

I was thinking something similar.

Using my extra test on Caithness.
Logged

Caithness

  • Hat Man
  • Tested
  • Karma: 8
  • Posts: 889
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #96 on: October 16, 2012, 04:24:56 PM »

If I were a Thing (which I was last game) I would wait until the second night after someone was confirmed human to turn them, because they're the most obvious test target the next day.
Logged

Friday

  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65374
  • Posts: 5122
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #97 on: October 16, 2012, 04:56:47 PM »

I was thinking something similar.

Using my extra test on Caithness.

I need you to bold this if it's an actual action.
Logged

Friend

  • Meow see here..
  • Tested
  • Karma: 4
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #98 on: October 16, 2012, 05:08:47 PM »

If we test caithness then I would suggest we also test aoko. That way, we can confirm the existence of 3 things among the starting players. Or, we'll know aoko is a thing if Caithness isn't turned.
Logged

gahitsu

  • Tested
  • Karma: 0
  • Posts: 156
    • View Profile
Re: Thing4 (Playing Thread)
« Reply #99 on: October 16, 2012, 05:23:00 PM »

If we test caithness then I would suggest we also test aoko. That way, we can confirm the existence of 3 things among the starting players. Or, we'll know aoko is a thing if Caithness isn't turned.

I don't really follow? If I understand you correctly, you're saying that we should try to find Patient Zero, and that's not the worst idea you could have in a Thing game. But I don't follow how testing Caithness leads to testing Aoko specifically, or why we should test Aoko at all. She's been laying low, but so has everyone else - what makes her particular?

Seriously, though, if I've missed something, feel free to illuminate.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 15