Topic: Thing4 (Playing Thread) (Read 15868 times)

Sharkey · « **Reply #40 on:** October 12, 2012, 02:07:15 PM »

I didn't bold it because it wasn't a vote.

And how about you stow the lip and actually tell me what's wrong with my conclusion, Kazz. If identifying a thing is more useful than confirming a human, especially on the first day when nothing else has been established, why would a human vote for themselves unless they were just dinking around?

So... I dunno. Test Caithness for no reason whatsoever.

Caithness · « **Reply #41 on:** October 12, 2012, 03:40:07 PM »

Yeah, Geo. It was a suggestion to throw dynamite at Kazz, not a vote to test him.

I also agree that it is not in a human's best interest to vote for himself, unless he's counting on being turned into a Thing. But there are now two people who have done so, Kazz and Ocksi. Guess I'll have to go with Kazz, who explicitly told me last game that his strategy was to get turned.

Ocksi · « **Reply #42 on:** October 12, 2012, 04:23:44 PM »

I'm switching back to Caithness because even though he is right that confirming humans at this point is totes worthless, he also seems to be totally against getting day one over with so we can see shit explode.

Caithness · « **Reply #43 on:** October 12, 2012, 04:32:55 PM »

If you just want to vote for the person with the most votes on them in order to get the day over with quickly, that is now Kazz.

Beat Bandit · « **Reply #44 on:** October 12, 2012, 05:44:17 PM »

Okay what? That response right after Ocksi's post makes me vote Caithness.

Beat Bandit · « **Reply #45 on:** October 12, 2012, 05:46:22 PM »

Okay I phrased that dumb but disproving him by showing off how fast you can get people to not look at you is pretty suspich.

Caithness · « **Reply #46 on:** October 12, 2012, 05:50:18 PM »

I don't undersand your clarification any more than the post it was clarifying.

Friend · « **Reply #47 on:** October 12, 2012, 06:17:44 PM »

I think caithness sounds the most suspicious at the moment
.

James Edward Smith · « **Reply #48 on:** October 12, 2012, 10:23:49 PM »

I honestly feel like Zara and now Ocksi are more suspicious. I maintain my Zara vote.

Destil · « **Reply #49 on:** October 13, 2012, 12:05:12 AM »

Yeah, sure. Let's test Caithness and hope for a thing who just wants to end day early for super fun conversion times, rather than a flamethrower who just wants to light someone up.

Beat Bandit · « **Reply #50 on:** October 13, 2012, 03:42:39 AM »

Quote from: Caithness on October 12, 2012, 05:50:18 PM

I don't undersand your clarification any more than the post it was clarifying.

Sober attempt:

Ocksi commented on drawing the day out. You quickly counter how Kazz is actually the fastest way to end the day. It feels less like you're calling Ocksi out on being dumb and more like you just revealed the reason you voted for Kazz.

Caithness · « **Reply #51 on:** October 13, 2012, 08:13:08 AM »

Ahh, I get it now. I was trying to point out how he was drawing the day out just as much as I was, but I can see how using the person I was voting for as an example might seem opportunistic.

But no, ending the day as fast as possible is not my goal. If it was, I would have to vote for myself now.

...Maybe that's another bad example.

Kazz · « **Reply #52 on:** October 13, 2012, 11:27:34 AM »

Sure, let's vote Caithness

Kayma · « **Reply #53 on:** October 13, 2012, 01:11:38 PM »

If I vote for caithness that's gotta be close to 7, right?

gahitsu · « **Reply #54 on:** October 13, 2012, 01:31:19 PM »

I'll vote Caithness too because Kazz was obviously being a smug shit.

I do have to ask, though. Sharkey has the free test, right? Isn't his vote for Caithness that free scan or does he specifically have to name his specific scan as such? I just want to make sure we're scanning as much as possible.

Kayma · « **Reply #55 on:** October 13, 2012, 01:39:50 PM »

Unless I'm confused, he used that on Geo in the first couple posts.

Sharkey · « **Reply #56 on:** October 13, 2012, 01:47:03 PM »

Yeah, I did Geo right off the bat. He's human, for now.

Anyway, I vote we take off all our clothes, pop a shitload of no-doz, and just stand in the same room staring at each other until spring.

... wait, the clothes thing is for puppet masters. Or maybe witches.

Whatever. Strip.

gahitsu · « **Reply #57 on:** October 13, 2012, 02:23:05 PM »

Oh, derp, I'm sorry.

Sharkey · « **Reply #58 on:** October 13, 2012, 07:21:49 PM »

You're still wearing some of your clothes.

But with such a naive and well intentioned question we can probably confirm you as human for today, creepy veiny stuff be damned.

Kazz · « **Reply #59 on:** October 13, 2012, 07:22:59 PM »

I'm happy to report that I am no longer wearing any of my clothes

News:

Author Topic: Thing4 (Playing Thread) (Read 15868 times)