Topic: Thing4 (Playing Thread) (Read 15900 times)

Friday · « **Reply #80 on:** October 15, 2012, 05:27:48 PM »

Quote from: Kazz on October 15, 2012, 12:06:38 PM

Quote from: Friday on October 15, 2012, 04:55:56 AM
But you know that the ranks of The Thing have increased.

B-, good atmosphere! keep it up

Kazz is found, hung by his own entrails. A note is clipped to his shirt:

"lol idk my bff jill?"

Kazz was the Grammar Nazi.

EDIT:

<Esperath> PS I really hope Kazz goes Grammar Nazi on your post
<Esperath> http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2005/hanged-or-hung/
<Friday> ohhhhhhhhhhh shiiiiiiii

Sharkey · « **Reply #81 on:** October 15, 2012, 06:13:01 PM »

Quote from: Caithness on October 15, 2012, 01:03:04 PM

2012-10-14 00:59:44< Sharkey> Except if I don't dynamite kazz first thing tomorrow, it means I've been turned.
2012-10-14 00:59:49< Sharkey> Or I changed my mind.
2012-10-14 00:59:53< Sharkey> Or I don't have dynamite.
2012-10-14 01:00:29< Sharkey> But seriously, burn him.
2012-10-14 01:00:39< Sharkey> just cus

Caith, if you actually read that it's a complete non-statement (i.e., a joke.)

I do kinda want to burn kazz, but I'll settle for just testing him. Not that I have anything against the guy. I just think he's funnier when he's on fire.

_{stupid goddamn not just murdering everybody for no reason mumblemumble etc}

Destil · « **Reply #82 on:** October 15, 2012, 06:31:09 PM »

So are there out of game communication rules here? I would assume so, though I'd also assume that something like that wouldn't really count as a violation.

For now I'm waiting to see how the free test turns out; personally I'd be inclined to scan Friend as he seemed to be more interested in an easy test than anything (pushing for both the vote leader and the self-voter).

Sharkey · « **Reply #83 on:** October 15, 2012, 06:38:39 PM »

Quote from: Destil on October 15, 2012, 06:31:09 PM

So are there out of game communication rules here? I would assume so, though I'd also assume that something like that wouldn't really count as a violation.

Yeah, that's why I asked. Nobody knew, so I made a smartass comment. Drunk fuckoffery while watching Baby Police wasn't exactly a strategy meeting. Unless I can vote for Baby Police to be nailed to a fucking cross made out of flamethrowers.

But for the sake of clarity, what are the rules on secret conspiracies or whatever?

gahitsu · « **Reply #84 on:** October 15, 2012, 08:01:50 PM »

I'd assume we can talk about it outside of the thread? I mean, I hope so, 'cause that's the reason I play here and not on TT. It's a ... caustic mentality there, to say the least.

Lottel · « **Reply #85 on:** October 15, 2012, 08:56:32 PM »

Pretty sure as long as Friday gets a transcript, it's cool.

Pretty sure.

Kazz · « **Reply #86 on:** October 16, 2012, 12:54:00 AM »

If you test me, I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.

A² · « **Reply #87 on:** October 16, 2012, 02:50:55 AM »

D...Double Kazzing?

Friday · « **Reply #88 on:** October 16, 2012, 04:49:12 AM »

Yeah, outside communication is fine. You're free to talk in IRC, send other players PMs, etc.

Like Lottel said, just remember to send me the transcript.

Friend · « **Reply #89 on:** October 16, 2012, 11:18:05 AM »

Quote from: Destil on October 15, 2012, 06:31:09 PM

For now I'm waiting to see how the free test turns out; personally I'd be inclined to scan Friend as he seemed to be more interested in an easy test than anything (pushing for both the vote leader and the self-voter).

I can accept the vote leader point, but I don't think it's fair to hold the self-voter vote against me, because Ocksi voted for themself after I already voted for them. Also, I don't mind if you want to test me, but personally I feel like it's a waste of time since I know I'm innocent. I would rather vote for zaratustra based on nothing but my instinct.

Caithness · « **Reply #90 on:** October 16, 2012, 11:54:26 AM »

Are you planning to use that test before time runs out, Lottel?

Zaratustra · « **Reply #91 on:** October 16, 2012, 12:06:23 PM »

We have... 16 more hours I think.

Voting for Lottel until he uses that dang wire.

Lottel · « **Reply #92 on:** October 16, 2012, 03:10:43 PM »

I was actually waiting for input on who I should use it on.

But if that's not acceptable, I'll look over the thread again during dinner and think on who to test.

Caithness · « **Reply #93 on:** October 16, 2012, 03:27:19 PM »

I already gave my input, I thought. I'm for using it on Sharkey.

Beat Bandit · « **Reply #94 on:** October 16, 2012, 03:52:44 PM »

My input: test caithness.

Just because I would've totally turned the one proven innocent as my first action, were I a the thing. Don't think it's great reasoning, but it's out there if you can't decide.

Lottel · « **Reply #95 on:** October 16, 2012, 04:11:28 PM »

I was thinking something similar.

Using my extra test on Caithness.

Caithness · « **Reply #96 on:** October 16, 2012, 04:24:56 PM »

If I were a Thing (which I was last game) I would wait until the second night after someone was confirmed human to turn them, because they're the most obvious test target the next day.

Friday · « **Reply #97 on:** October 16, 2012, 04:56:47 PM »

Quote from: Lottel on October 16, 2012, 04:11:28 PM

I was thinking something similar.

Using my extra test on Caithness.

I need you to bold this if it's an actual action.

Friend · « **Reply #98 on:** October 16, 2012, 05:08:47 PM »

If we test caithness then I would suggest we also test aoko. That way, we can confirm the existence of 3 things among the starting players. Or, we'll know aoko is a thing if Caithness isn't turned.

gahitsu · « **Reply #99 on:** October 16, 2012, 05:23:00 PM »

Quote from: Friend on October 16, 2012, 05:08:47 PM

If we test caithness then I would suggest we also test aoko. That way, we can confirm the existence of 3 things among the starting players. Or, we'll know aoko is a thing if Caithness isn't turned.

I don't really follow? If I understand you correctly, you're saying that we should try to find Patient Zero, and that's not the worst idea you could have in a Thing game. But I don't follow how testing Caithness leads to testing Aoko specifically, or why we should test Aoko at all. She's been laying low, but so has everyone else - what makes her particular?

Seriously, though, if I've missed something, feel free to illuminate.

News:

Author Topic: Thing4 (Playing Thread) (Read 15900 times)