Topic: What the fuck? (Read 299674 times)

Royal☭ · « **Reply #2460 on:** January 19, 2011, 06:34:22 PM »

President Obama did have some videos he made, and his own YouTube channel.

I gotta admit, those words are a lot more amusing if you imagine it's just him doing everything.

Mongrel · « **Reply #2461 on:** January 19, 2011, 07:49:01 PM »

Columns seem different in a way from the past "president touches the masses" like the radio or television spots or the youtube channel, because it would involve him deliberately communicating (and arguing for) a fairly specific opinion on a given subject, on a regular basis. It's something different from playing "above the fray" or being a partisan hack. It's very... personal.

I mean, the last presidents to do THAT were probably contemporaries of the founding fathers (though I could easily be wrong).

Thad · « **Reply #2462 on:** January 19, 2011, 11:32:12 PM »

Quote from: Beat Bandit on January 19, 2011, 03:38:05 PM

Quote
Mr. Obama is president of the United States.
Well I think two presidents with the same name would be a bit over-the-top.

Just look what happened LAST time.

Mongrel · « **Reply #2463 on:** January 20, 2011, 03:53:33 AM »

Oh man, anybody else catch this now-redacted Harry Reid quote:

Quote

I am going to go back to Washington and meet with the President of China. He is a dictator. He can do a lot of things through the form of government they have.

Ted Belmont · « **Reply #2464 on:** January 28, 2011, 03:52:19 PM »

House Republicans want to redefine rape.

My avatar seems pretty appropriate right about now.

Catloaf · « **Reply #2465 on:** January 29, 2011, 07:00:49 AM »

But it's for the greater cause of making damn sure ~~the poor stay miserable!~~...er, that pre-babies are allowed to ruin their mothers-to-be's lives, have horrible childhoods doing nothing but burdening the tax-payers with their mother's social security and eventually add to the crime rate!...no no no--That women remain 2nd class citizens!... Ah, fuck it.

Brentai · « **Reply #2466 on:** January 29, 2011, 07:33:02 AM »

It's a lot simpler than that. Fundamentalists think all 13-year-old girls should be having babies.

That's it.

Büge · « **Reply #2467 on:** January 29, 2011, 08:14:44 AM »

Quote

The bill hasn't been carefully constructed, Levenson notes. The term "forcible rape" is not defined in the federal criminal code, and the bill's authors don't offer their own definition.

Then all we need to do is redefine force.

Friday · « **Reply #2468 on:** January 29, 2011, 12:50:20 PM »

Quote

redefine force.

tiny organisms living in our cells

Classic · « **Reply #2469 on:** January 29, 2011, 02:32:16 PM »

Mitochondria?

Bal · « **Reply #2470 on:** January 29, 2011, 02:43:07 PM »

Quote from: Classic on January 29, 2011, 02:32:16 PM

Mitochondria?

No, those help create chemical energy in human cells and the powers in Parasite Eve. You're thinking of Midichlorians, which are responsible for The Force, and also blood coming out of my ears.

Classic · « **Reply #2471 on:** January 29, 2011, 03:41:48 PM »

Well, don't be too sure! If you catch fire or turn inside-out it could still be mitochondria!

Disposable Ninja · « **Reply #2472 on:** January 29, 2011, 07:44:08 PM »

You know what? Fuck it, I'm Pro-Life now.

I believe life totally starts at conception. And, therefor, there should be a law that has citizenship bestowed at conception.

Now to take my proposed law to the Tea Party, and see how many heads I can make explode.

JDigital · « **Reply #2473 on:** January 29, 2011, 09:30:40 PM »

Quote from: Brentai on January 29, 2011, 07:33:02 AM

Fundamentalists think all 13-year-old girls should be having babies.

Except the "purity balls" people.

Mongrel · « **Reply #2474 on:** January 29, 2011, 11:40:46 PM »

Nah, they just want those 13-year olds to be properly trapped in a marriage first.

Catloaf · « **Reply #2475 on:** January 30, 2011, 01:56:43 AM »

Quote from: Yes, send the militia on January 29, 2011, 09:30:40 PM

Quote from: Brentai on January 29, 2011, 07:33:02 AM
Fundamentalists think all 13-year-old girls should be having babies.

Except the "purity balls" people.

Quote from: Mongrel on January 29, 2011, 11:40:46 PM

Nah, they just want those 13-year olds to be properly trapped in a marriage first.

Well, that and they're struggling with their powerful urges to be the incestuous father/grandfather of said babies. And thus are jealous of all potential suitors.

sei · « **Reply #2476 on:** January 30, 2011, 02:16:45 AM »

Conservative pharmacists refuse to fill uteran bleeding control prescriptions for patients having abortions.

Thad · « **Reply #2477 on:** January 30, 2011, 03:59:59 AM »

I've said it before, but it bears repeating: I don't eat beef. I have strong political objections to the beef industry.

But if I went to work at a McDonald's and refused to sell people burgers, what the fuck do you think would happen to me?

Classic · « **Reply #2478 on:** January 30, 2011, 04:30:13 AM »

You'd be celebrated as a hero doing your part to combat evil by the religious right?

Catloaf · « **Reply #2479 on:** January 30, 2011, 05:29:50 AM »

Why can't people understand that in certain situations an individual must relinquish certain rights as to perform the social service in which they willingly sought in a way that does not potentially violate the rights of those whom the individual is meant to serve?

If one is an executioner, they have to kill condemned criminals even if they don't want to. If people could hold positions of employment while refusing to serve their clientele based on personal beliefs, we would still have "Whites Only" signs displayed on some businesses. Yet the courts continue to rule in the goddamn incompetent pharmacists' favor, ignoring the implications.

Condemning someone for doing something that is perfectly legal is condemning someone for doing something completely legal!!! It doesn't matter if it's by choice or out of the victim's control, YOU CAN'T FUCKING DO THAT!!!

News:

Author Topic: What the fuck? (Read 299674 times)