Why can't people understand that in certain situations an individual must relinquish certain rights as to perform the social service in which they willingly sought in a way that does not potentially violate the rights of those whom the individual is meant to serve?
If one is an executioner, they have to kill condemned criminals even if they don't want to. If people could hold positions of employment while refusing to serve their clientele based on personal beliefs, we would still have "Whites Only" signs displayed on some businesses. Yet the courts continue to rule in the goddamn incompetent pharmacists' favor, ignoring the implications.
Condemning someone for doing something that is perfectly legal is condemning someone for doing something completely legal!!! It doesn't matter if it's by choice or out of the victim's control, YOU CAN'T FUCKING DO THAT!!!