That was a lot of fun! Thanks for dragging my bloody corpse to victory, Manpires!

Ugh. This kind of thing disgusts me. See, I consider the no lynch a completely legitimate option while Garrison doesn't even see it as an option on the table. Someone does not have to die on day one. Second, it's completely idiotic to vote for someone simply because other people are voting for them. Garrison, I would feel compelled to vote for you if I didn't feel like it would be a complete waste of time, since most people are already set on voting for Verde or Envy and I don't think I could convince enough people to change their votes to lynch you.

Okay, here's the logic behind it:

No lynch gives the bad guys progress and us zero. We gain literally nothing from not lynching. In a game where we need whatever information we can get to have a chance at winning, No lynch is not only a poor choice, but something I perceive as a pure, bad dude oriented move that just looks nice on the outside.

By choosing to lynch someone, we do risk the possibility of having a goodguy die, but we also get a firm grasp on where everyone stands in exchange. This is the information that we need to progress, the same information we'd be getting a whole day later if we choose not to do it now. Point is, I'd rather us start off strong the next day rather than on Day 3. Hell, there's always the slim chance that we might actually succeed and get someone with this lynch.

Granted, this is my first multifaction game and my first item-empowered game, but I'm pretty sure the logic still stands from the town perspective. Feel free to argue, yo.

What would you like to hear from me? I've already made it clear that I don't want to no-vote today. I just don't have anyone to kill quite yet. :D

A chance to play with Joxam? Fuck yes, I am in on this.