Brontoforumus Archive

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:


This board has been fossilized.
You are reading an archive of Brontoforumus, a.k.a. The Worst Forums Ever, from 2008 to early 2014.  Registration and posting (for most members) has been disabled here to discourage spambots from taking over.  Old members can still log in to view boards, PMs, etc.

The new message board is at http://brontoforum.us.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Mongrel

Pages: 1 ... 807 808 809 810 811 [812]
16221
High-Context Discourse / Re: I am going to GDC
« on: February 23, 2008, 05:09:10 PM »
There's nothing wrong with having a conversation on the phone.

But what if someone told you they were more comfortable having phone conversations than face-to-face conversations. What if that same person would go as far as avoiding any and all face-to-face conversations in favour of phone conversations? 

Would that seem a bit odd?

I think that ultimately, supra-MMOs, value-added internets, parallel digital worlds, infinite sandboxes, better-than-life, or whatever-the-hell-you-want-to-call-it is simply media. Possibly educational, possibly entertaining, and possibly as revolutionary as the printed word, sure. But it's still just a new medium for the transmission of information - and maybe a way to have a little fun.

It isn't is a panacea to solve our problems nor is it some kind of replacement - partial or otherwise - for conventional human interaction. As long as we remain these fleshy biological units, we will be always be constrained by these forms to at least some degree (no matter how much we love to try and deny this).

People don't have a clear picture of how this new medium will change society. But man, do they love making guesses. Wild claims are always made with regards to new earth-shattering technological innovations, it's simply that in this case, the vast amorphous form of this new coalescing network makes it harder to refute such pronouncements and harder to see that the 'internets plus' is simply another techonological innovation: neutral when considered on it's own, only gaining one value or another through use by humans. No more or less than a clay tablet, printing press, telegraph, camera, or computer. And at least some of us are old enough to recall the grandiose claims made regarding that last one (Dibbell and Barlow, you poor bastards).

When we look at what the medium itself has to say*, what I've seen so far has been a mixed bag. We have increased access to information and valuable information redundancy, but also isolation disguised as social contact, the loss of existing social skills, and information corruption. Like any advancements in our past, theres been a tradeoff. I worry that while the quantity of information is increeasing expotentially, our ability to use it, and use it effectively. is remaining static, or is even decreasing. Witness the recent subprime meltdown. It's not Facebook Final Fantasy, I know, but bear with me. Those of you familiar with current financial services may know something of modern-day risk management. Modern risk managers had an unprecendented wealth of historical data, formulae, closed testing environments, intercompany communications networks, daily spot tests, and other safeguards to help minimise their risk and provide an accurate picture of what was going on. And then reality rolled into town (well, really, it never left. In fact, it IS the town) and a lot of folks lost their shirts (and houses).

The perfect example of my griping would be the current smouldering fire in the background over control over IANA and ICANN. It's all well and good to talk about interconnectedness, but there's a small-but-real chance that real-life meat-and-iron power struggles will shatter the internet's inviolate state. In the worst case scenario, the resulting balkanization will all make us wish for the glory days of uh... 4chan.

I'm not forecasting the end times here, I just wish that people would stop assuming success is assured and that technology will fix all of our damn problems. You want to talk about evolution, well you'd like to think that that we could at least learn that one damn lesson. We've only had 40 000 years to try. 

P.S. Other than the beginning, this post isn't really a direct response to you Sharkey, more just me clarifying my earlier trolling yelling pointlessly for the kids to get off my lawn :wuv:

*As a Canadian, I'm honour-bound to invoke McLuhan ;)

16222
High-Context Discourse / Re: I am going to GDC
« on: February 23, 2008, 08:39:43 AM »
I love it when people declare their inconsequential dismissal of the physical world, dismissing trees, water, ashphalt, smokestacks, sex (the real kind, har har), fists, bullets, and pandas driving combine harvesters at one fell swoop.

Also, props to Arc for mentioning the 1970's film revolution, which is a far more apt comparison for the level-headed optomist.

16223
Thaddeus Boyd's Panel of Death / Re: Oh! Bama
« on: February 21, 2008, 07:05:19 PM »


Man... every now and then Aislin just hits that muthafuckin' high note.

16224
Media / Re: Videodrome
« on: February 20, 2008, 04:29:21 PM »
I don't think it's humanly possible to have made a more apt video for the man.

16225
High-Context Discourse / Re: Small Talk
« on: February 20, 2008, 04:19:12 PM »
Well, remember one of the most important (if not the most important) rules of being a good conversationalist: This is not all about you.

Practice good listening skills and ask a few genuine questions (how-was-your-day? type of stuff etc.). Then the burden of conversation shifts to the other person in a way that doesn't make you look bad. After they talk for a bit, you'll have more information regarding the other person such as: acceptable boundaries for conversation, the other person's interests, common ground, etc.

If you're lucky, that sets off a great conversation where you just bounce points back and forth and have fun. But at worst you'll at least have a starting point for talking and you'll avoid seeming like a self-centred jerk.

And again: practice good listening skills.

16226
Thaddeus Boyd's Panel of Death / Re: Random catch-all thread
« on: February 20, 2008, 04:05:15 PM »
Didn't see a thread for this purpose, so while we know Arc loves making thread icons...

Whoever's moderating, feel free to split and/or merge stuff in here as necessary.

First story: Restraint? What restraint?

16227
Thaddeus Boyd's Panel of Death / Re: Ron Paul: My Dream
« on: February 18, 2008, 05:31:29 PM »
LOL.

While in Washington state the past week, his campaign for that state's primary was still in full swing. I actually saw two fully operational campaign centres in Seattle and NO END of bumper stickers.

It's the zombie that Just. Won't. Fucking. Die.

16228
High-Context Discourse / Re: Test Subject #57
« on: February 08, 2008, 10:28:41 PM »
*sniggering*

16229
High-Context Discourse / Re: Test Subject #57
« on: February 08, 2008, 04:47:16 PM »
Yeah, you were the last person with anything really to say from the old boards that I didn't see here.

Well, I'd like to see Vance I suppose.

16230
Thaddeus Boyd's Panel of Death / Re: Anonymous vs Scientology
« on: February 08, 2008, 04:55:30 AM »
Oh I suspecet this isn't the same 'anonymous' at all, whether or not the name was chosen again for deliberate mayhem, or just for shits-n-giggles.

16231
High-Context Discourse / Re: Odds'n'Ends
« on: February 07, 2008, 07:02:45 PM »
I just realized that there's no displayed postcount.

 :wuv: :wuv: :wuv:

16232
High-Context Discourse / Re: Test Subject #57
« on: February 07, 2008, 06:32:59 PM »
Hey, is SCD here? If yes, I don't really need to go back to the old forums at all.

WASTE LAND

16233
Thaddeus Boyd's Panel of Death / Re: Primary Wars
« on: February 07, 2008, 06:31:04 PM »
I don't understand what's going on! I always relied on Iron_Mongrel to translate your American political language.

:wuv:

Nobody told me where everybody went :sadpanda:    I missed the link.  :hurr:

16234
Thaddeus Boyd's Panel of Death / Re: Anonymous vs Scientology
« on: February 07, 2008, 06:01:07 PM »
"And for our own enjoyment."

Also, where's the animated gif of the 'anonymous' van from the FOX EXPOSE exploding?

16235
High-Context Discourse / Re: Test Subject #57
« on: February 07, 2008, 05:33:54 PM »
So this is where you fuckers all went.

MYSTERY SOLVED.

 :hurr:

Pages: 1 ... 807 808 809 810 811 [812]