Nope, but the Tea Party is a pretty disorganized "organization" anyway, with a boatload of factional infighting.
The main point is that it's possible that there's an argument to be made for "regressing" the US to it's isolationist era (effectively decimating all international commitments and plowing the resources back into purely commercial pursuits). I don't necessarily
agree with such an argument or think it would be a good idea (or practical), but there's a cogent argument somebody
could make, and it's a debate the US could probably stand to have.
But since the Tea Party is mostly made up of complete morons, they pick bizarre and random things to cling to - things which call back to an older time, like "OMG GOLD STANDARD" - with no real understanding of the underlying causes of such phenomena. So, comedy. Even if they wouldn't all call for a return to a property qualifications for voting, it's an absolutely perfect example of the kind of batshit thinking that drives the movement.
Hell,
just look at their name.P.S. This was by far my favourite comment on the article:
renters still have a vested interest in the area they live in. maybe not as much as owners. perhaps 3/5ths of a vote is appropriate?