Yes it does. It just doesn't call it "original sin."
I was not, in fact, trolling. Well, kinda, but I was also hoping to spark some debate to glean for information (like I always do). Call me crazy, but I'm 200% ends-justifies-the-means. Even if a side-effect is people hating me (big whup, there's lotsa haters in the world, none of them original).
I honestly have no idea if the bible ever specifically says the words, "original sin."
See that quote above? I call that a shifting the burden of proof bait-and-switch combomeal (coupled with a bit of semantical dodging): I can now interpret any part of the bible referencing Adam, sinful nature or sin itself to be "original sin," all of which means nothing to the original point.
You won the argument Kashan. Thanks for ruining it Thad, you douche.
You know, most people study ethics to learn what to
avoid saying. I think if my teachers knew what I take from their classes to fill my life skills toolbox with they'd kick me out summarily.
Uh... niggers and homos should burn in hell; let's re-elect G. W. Bush and fuck the environment with a pollution-crucifix. The end.
Of course, by saying all of this I'm destroying what I've so carefully crafted. I guess I'm also a bit of a nihilist.
