Topic: LGBT (Read 60204 times)

TA · « **Reply #260 on:** August 08, 2009, 12:54:33 PM »

They tried to warn us, but we didn't listen!

yyler · « **Reply #261 on:** August 08, 2009, 01:06:19 PM »

She's in a bizarre documentary about women who fall in love with inanimate objects that made me kind of uneasy the entire time. I think it's called I Married the Berlin Wall or something. I watched it on Veoh once but it got taken down.

It's really unsettling. Also kind of depressing, because they fall in love with the Berlin Wall or the WTC and then those things get torn down.

Büge · « **Reply #262 on:** August 09, 2009, 06:32:20 AM »

Better than marrying 12-year-old anime characters.

JDigital · « **Reply #263 on:** August 09, 2009, 07:21:18 AM »

Punchline: "There's twelve of them!"

Büge · « **Reply #264 on:** August 10, 2009, 05:08:02 PM »

If I still worked for Tim Hortons, this would probably make me quit.

Cobalt · « **Reply #265 on:** August 10, 2009, 05:16:32 PM »

Tim Hortons back out of anti-gay marriage event

Brentai · « **Reply #266 on:** August 10, 2009, 05:21:19 PM »

Apparently Dunkin Donuts has a similar track record.

You'd think an industry based around the consumptions of holes...

Mongrel · « **Reply #267 on:** August 11, 2009, 02:54:05 AM »

Nothing to get very worked up over. I read in the news LAST WEEK that they had cancelled their sponsorship (which just goes to show that readng mainstream papers is not always a bad thing).

Apparently it was just one of those retarded instances where a corporation threw some money at a nice-sounding 'local community organization', without bothering to, you know, actually do any research on what it is that that organization actually supports.

The Artist Formerly Known As Yoji · « **Reply #268 on:** September 14, 2009, 09:15:19 PM »

I've heard some wacky reasons to keep them gosh darned gheys out of the military, but Roman rape tales? News to me and, apparently, to everyone else present.

I'm getting kind of tired of the whole "New Rome" argument that I've heard about how decadent the US has become. Sure, we profess all that abstinence until marriage while giving anal on the first date and all that. We write rap lyrics about it. But it's not like we feed people to lions for fun or burn people alive just because they say something we don't like... actually, scratch that last one. Some crackpots still do that.

Anyway, can we just give the Rome anecdotes a rest? Please?

Alex · « **Reply #269 on:** September 14, 2009, 09:47:43 PM »

Everyone knows that buttsex in the military builds a sense of camaraderie because no one wants to see their ~~fuck~~buddy get axed!

That's totally how the Romans did it!

TA · « **Reply #270 on:** September 16, 2009, 11:18:31 AM »

Respect for Marriage act introduced in House, 93 co-sponsors.

The full text of the bill:

Quote

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Respect for Marriage Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SECTION ADDED TO TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, BY
SECTION 2 OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT.

Section 1738C of title 28, United States Code, is repealed, and the
table of sections at the beginning of chapter 115 of title 28, United
States Code, is amended by striking the item relating to that section.

SEC. 3. MARRIAGE RECOGNITION.

Section 7 of title 1, United States Code, is amended to read as
follows:
``Sec. 7. Marriage
``(a) For the purposes of any Federal law in which marital status
is a factor, an individual shall be considered married if that
individual's marriage is valid in the State where the marriage was
entered into or, in the case of a marriage entered into outside any
State, if the marriage is valid in the place where entered into and the
marriage could have been entered into in a State.
``(b) In this section, the term `State' means a State, the District
of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any other territory or
possession of the United States.''.

Sharkey · « **Reply #271 on:** September 21, 2009, 05:25:27 PM »

Isn't there some kind of law against bills I can read and comprehend within thirty seconds?

... which would be the awesomest if it could be read and understood in thirty seconds.

Catloaf · « **Reply #272 on:** September 21, 2009, 05:53:34 PM »

So... "Anyone married in a state where the marriage is valid, is married in the eyes of the federal government." And probably also in all other states in the union, but that I'm not sure about.

So, go get gay married, then lord it over your bigot neighbors that it's just as sacred in the eyes of the government as their traditional marriage which can yield children.

Then have gay sex in front of their children.

Cthulhu-chan · « **Reply #273 on:** September 21, 2009, 06:53:37 PM »

Well no, don't do that last part. That's still illegal.

Disposable Ninja · « **Reply #274 on:** September 21, 2009, 07:00:50 PM »

For now. Getting that out of the way in #6 on the Gay Agenda.

Cthulhu-chan · « **Reply #275 on:** September 21, 2009, 07:05:07 PM »

Is that before or after the sexing up the straight people to make them gay? I forget.

Burrito Al Pastor · « **Reply #276 on:** September 21, 2009, 07:56:58 PM »

That's how you make them gay. Indoctrinate them while they're young.

Royal☭ · « **Reply #277 on:** September 21, 2009, 08:05:56 PM »

Only thing that can make you gay is perfectly heterosexual pornography.

The Artist Formerly Known As Yoji · « **Reply #278 on:** September 21, 2009, 09:35:37 PM »

So lemme get it strai- er, am I getting this right? When you look at porn, your sexual drive "turns inwards." Which means you involve yourself in whatever fantasy the porn is facilitating. Since you involve yourself, and therefore your own same sex, that makes you gay regardless of the pornographic material or involved fantasy.

...did I get it? Because this slope I've found myself on seems to be providing rather substandard traction.

And while I'm at it:

Quote from: Tom "Totally Straight" Coburn

If it doesn’t turn you homosexual, it at least renders you less capable of loving your wife.

I somehow see that situation playing out differently...

: So... whatcha think?

: Sounds nice, but there's no such things as tentacle monsters, I'd need to dye my hair, we'd have to find a bulk supplier of KY Gel, and I have no idea how we'd do position "34"...

Cthulhu-chan · « **Reply #279 on:** September 21, 2009, 11:48:41 PM »

Quote from: Yoji on September 21, 2009, 09:35:37 PM

no such things as tentacle monsters

Next you'll tell me Santa Claus isn't real!

News:

Author Topic: LGBT (Read 60204 times)