Really, because he's always come off as a bit of a dick to me, even when he's breaking down other people's stupid arguments. As he feels the need to make an argument where there isn't one. Or I might be thinking of someone else...
If someone's looking for an argument, and they're making a bad one sure, but making an argument out of a comment that was obviously written while half asleep and not looking for an argument at all that's not immensely stupid--stating something that is unarguably wrong or mislead--is just being a dick.
When I look at the world, I see the number of stupid, ignorant, corrupt, and out-right malevolent outnumber the number of people who consciously try to make the world a better place and have actually thought about how one might do so. I thoughtlessly make a comment stating as such, and he feels the need to turn it into an argument based on the particular wording, which I stupidly exacerbate by trying to elaborate without realizing exactly what was going on, which is that I was going to be made an even bigger fool for not having thought out and thoroughly researched my personal observation.
I know pacifism doesn't actually work to solve much, but it's the only thing that logically works to hold a firm moral stance as anything else would be poked full of even more holes ala 'so this is okay, but this isn't!?' bullshit that isn't actually convincing anyone of anything other than putting me down and shoving one's own cock further down one's throat while accusing the rest of sucking eachother's cocks for not joining in to make it a full-fledged lynching.
It's fine if you're actually using it to teach someone something, but if you're just using someone as a punching bag it's being a dick. This wasn't an argument over a point, this was 'look at how stupid this fucker is'!!