Topic: What the fuck, Arizona? (Read 56341 times)

Burrito Al Pastor · « **Reply #140 on:** July 17, 2010, 01:25:56 PM »

I like how that article puts "nacro-terrorist" in quotes, like this guy is the only person to use that term.

Bal · « **Reply #141 on:** July 17, 2010, 01:36:38 PM »

I think they put it in quotes because it's a stupid, made up, fear mongering word no matter who uses it.

Also Arizona is extremely racist, so I'm not surprised by this at all really. We didn't recognize MLK day until, what, '91?

Catloaf · « **Reply #142 on:** July 17, 2010, 01:52:10 PM »

So, how is it news that neo-nazi fuckwits with guns are looking for brown people to shoot at?

I would actually prefer diseased, drug-smuggling, criminally-inclined illegal immigrants than those racist bastards. (Not implying that illegal immigrants are all possessing such attributes, but stating the assumed the worst-case scenario)

I actually think all neo-nazis should be imprisoned. Under the rationalization that one voids their basic human rights if one advocates taking away a group's basic human rights. At the very least I think these sort of people don't deserve the right to bare arms as they pose too much of a threat to society to possess them.

Ocksi · « **Reply #143 on:** July 17, 2010, 02:31:43 PM »

Quote from: Catloaf on July 17, 2010, 01:52:10 PM

At the very least I think these sort of people don't deserve the right to bare arms

I don't know that making them wear long sleeves in Arizona is really very fair at all.

Brentai · « **Reply #144 on:** July 17, 2010, 03:06:42 PM »

Quote from: Catloaf on July 17, 2010, 01:52:10 PM

I actually think all neo-nazis should be imprisoned. Under the rationalization that one voids their basic human rights if one advocates taking away a group's basic human rights.

You just argued yourself into a prison cell, genius.

Detonator · « **Reply #145 on:** July 17, 2010, 03:37:28 PM »

Quote from: Catloaf on July 17, 2010, 01:52:10 PM

I actually think all neo-nazis should be imprisoned. Under the rationalization that one voids their basic human rights if one advocates taking away a group's basic human rights.

Bal · « **Reply #146 on:** July 17, 2010, 05:04:32 PM »

Ted Belmont · « **Reply #147 on:** July 17, 2010, 05:06:01 PM »

What's wrong with sleepy terrorists

Bal · « **Reply #148 on:** July 17, 2010, 05:06:41 PM »

Can't you see?! They're dreaming up new ideas!!

Thad · « **Reply #149 on:** July 17, 2010, 08:40:26 PM »

Quote from: Ziiro on July 17, 2010, 01:03:17 PM

This is just getting silly.

THAD EDIT: Ziiro's link is to an article titled "Man with neo-Nazi ties leading patrols in AZ". You're welcome.

The New Times has been on this for years but for some reason the MSM hasn't paid a lot of attention to it. Memo to reporters: yes, comparing people to nazis is usually hyperbolic, distasteful demagoguery...but NOT WHEN THEY'RE ACTUALLY NAZIS.

To wit, my absolute favorite somebody-doesn't-even-know-what-nazi-is-short-for quote:

Quote from: http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2010/05/neo-nazi_jt_ready_handled_with.php

In his write-up on ABC 15's site, [reporter Christopher] Sign states that [National Socialist Movement] is "considered by many to be a neo-Nazi hate group."

Brentai · « **Reply #150 on:** July 17, 2010, 09:26:03 PM »

Quote

Ready called NSM "the premier white civil right [sic] organization in the world," and informed Sign that the "respectful term" for his ilk would be "National Socialist," insisting that he and his fellow SS-wannabes are "American patriots."

I wonder if claiming overriding loyalty to the actual literal former German government can be legally considered treason.

Mongrel · « **Reply #151 on:** July 17, 2010, 09:32:50 PM »

I'm sure the president would approve.

McDohl · « **Reply #152 on:** July 18, 2010, 06:16:46 AM »

OH SHIT. WE CALLED OBAMA A SOCIALIST AND A NAZI!! WE CAN'T AGREE WITH THEM!

Then they all vanished in a puff of logic.

Catloaf · « **Reply #153 on:** July 18, 2010, 08:32:10 AM »

Quote from: Brentai on July 17, 2010, 03:06:42 PM

Quote from: Catloaf on July 17, 2010, 01:52:10 PM
I actually think all neo-nazis should be imprisoned. Under the rationalization that one voids their basic human rights if one advocates taking away a group's basic human rights.

You just argued yourself into a prison cell, genius.

Only because of my awful choice of wording. Going by on an individual basis, rather than 'all neo-nazis', which are actually internally homogeneous on the point of hating everyone else by definition, I have not.

Better although probably still pretty bad wording:
If an individual believes that a group of people do not deserve their basic human rights, and said group is based on attributes that those within it do not have control over (such as race, gender, or country of origin), then they have provided sufficient evidence in my mind of no longer deserving the basic human rights that they believe the group should not have.

Thad · « **Reply #154 on:** July 18, 2010, 01:52:39 PM »

Cruel and inhuman punishments are being carefully described in tiny paragraphs so they won't conflict with the Constitution (which, itself, is being modified in order to accommodate THE FUTURE).

Bal · « **Reply #155 on:** July 18, 2010, 01:56:32 PM »

Doubleplusgood example of thoughtcrime there, Catloaf.

EDIT: I'm sorry, that should have been "crimethink". My Newspeak is a little rusty.

Mongrel · « **Reply #156 on:** July 18, 2010, 02:11:20 PM »

I think you guys may in fact be giving Catloaf too much credit.

Bal · « **Reply #157 on:** July 18, 2010, 02:14:03 PM »

So he's not an Orwellian neo-fascist, he's just stupid?

Mongrel · « **Reply #158 on:** July 18, 2010, 02:35:22 PM »

I've got a bag of hammers here, and compared to Catloaf, they've got a PHD in advanced rocket surgery.

Classic · « **Reply #159 on:** July 18, 2010, 09:11:14 PM »

No matter what you guys say, I <3 catloaf because he says all of the things I do when I'm too busy having opinions to be self-aware.

News:

Author Topic: What the fuck, Arizona? (Read 56341 times)