Topic: What the fuck? (Read 315081 times)

Mongrel · « **Reply #1420 on:** October 03, 2009, 06:22:41 PM »

Correction: That should read "Ahmadinejad was born a Jew".

Catloaf · « **Reply #1421 on:** October 03, 2009, 06:44:40 PM »

FACT: The greatest threats to Jews are other Jews.

Büge · « **Reply #1422 on:** October 04, 2009, 12:21:17 PM »

FACT: Jews fight ALL the time.

Catloaf · « **Reply #1423 on:** October 04, 2009, 12:25:14 PM »

Well... only if arguing counts.

(Based on interpretation of previous post as 'Fighting at every waking moment of their existence')

François · « **Reply #1424 on:** October 05, 2009, 03:34:10 PM »

Terrorist attempts to kill Saudi counter-terrorist official by detonating a bomb hidden in his ass.

Quote

The resulting explosion ripped al-Asiri to shreds but only lightly injured the shocked prince — the target of al-Asiri’s unsuccessful assassination attempt.

Quote from: http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/best_prank_ever/

I think Saudi Arabia played this wrong. Instead of telling the state controlled media that the ASSassination attempt failed, they should have reported that the Deputy Interior Minister was dead, and so was everyone else in the building. And they should have said there was no way to stop this sort of brilliant attack. Within weeks, every member of Al Qaeada would have shoved a too-small bomb up his ass and detonated it in a market or mosque. The innocent bystanders would be startled and perhaps a little bit slimed, but otherwise unhurt. Terrorism would have a quick and amusing conclusion.

Brentai · « **Reply #1425 on:** October 05, 2009, 04:10:00 PM »

And it would have slaked every American's desire to see each individual member of Al-Qaeda have a bomb shoved up their ass.

Catloaf · « **Reply #1426 on:** October 05, 2009, 05:28:57 PM »

Well, a good number of Americans would be a little disappointed that the bombs were up the terrorist's asses without said American's boots accompanying them.

TA · « **Reply #1427 on:** October 06, 2009, 10:32:19 AM »

Antonin Scalia hates that good minds are being wasted on something as valueless to society as "Lawyering".

Royal☭ · « **Reply #1428 on:** October 06, 2009, 10:37:26 AM »

You have to follow his example, where it's clear that there is not a good mind being wasted on law.

SCD · « **Reply #1429 on:** October 08, 2009, 09:21:04 AM »

On the subject of that French director being extradited from Switzerland... And their protest to this extradition...

..It looks like their consistent in their values. That's another thing they have in common with the Afghan Police..

Shinra · « **Reply #1430 on:** October 08, 2009, 12:08:39 PM »

What is with texas and it's constant attempts at breeding the world's toughest rednecks?

I get the feeling that everyone in Texas just watches movies about the alamo 11 hours a day and gets a hard on every time davy crockett kills a spaniard.

Disposable Ninja · « **Reply #1431 on:** October 08, 2009, 12:25:31 PM »

Quote from: Shinra on October 08, 2009, 12:08:39 PM

I get the feeling that everyone in Texas just watches movies about the alamo 11 hours a day and gets a hard on every time davy crockett kills a spaniard.

No, you jackass. You've got it all wrong.

Quote from: Shinra on October 08, 2009, 12:08:39 PM

I get the feeling that everyone in Texas just watches movies about the alamo 11 hours a day and gets a hard on every time davy crockett kills a mexican.

Get your fucking facts in order.

Niku · « **Reply #1432 on:** October 08, 2009, 01:25:19 PM »

i pretty much get a hard on anytime anyone mentions davy crockett

whoop there it goes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kweL_RUXXU4

TA · « **Reply #1433 on:** October 08, 2009, 04:02:03 PM »

Oh for FUCK'S SAKE, Scalia. Crosses aren't religious symbols? Really?

Brentai · « **Reply #1434 on:** October 08, 2009, 04:10:15 PM »

Quote

Eliasberg dares to correct him: "The cross is the most common symbol of the resting place of Christians. I have been in Jewish cemeteries. There is never a cross on a tombstone of a Jew."

"I don't think you can leap from that to the conclusion that the only war dead the cross honors are the Christian war dead," thunders Scalia. "I think that's an outrageous conclusion!"

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that one of the Ultimate Lawyers in this country is a master of reductio ad absurdum, I just find it more unbelievable than ever that we're supposed to trust him with the entire body of our law.

The Artist Formerly Known As Yoji · « **Reply #1435 on:** October 08, 2009, 04:19:43 PM »

I've got an idea, guys.

How about instead of a cross, star, crescent moon, or giant phallus, we mark a grave with the head of the deceased impaled upon a stake? Nice and universal, right? Right.

Brentai · « **Reply #1436 on:** October 08, 2009, 04:23:01 PM »

I'd say burning effigy of Hitler would do it, but that's the wrong war.

What did WWI soldiers care about? Getting better food then D and K rations? Maybe we can honor them by building a four-star restaurant over their graves?

Royal☭ · « **Reply #1437 on:** October 08, 2009, 04:38:36 PM »

Capitalism!

Also, on the subject of Schalia, I'd convinced the man is actually mentally retarded. I heard him arguing about the torturing animals on video case, at which point he proceeded to make the same false equivalency at least 2 times, only replacing what it was he was equivocating with different things.

Mongrel · « **Reply #1438 on:** October 08, 2009, 05:34:59 PM »

Quote from: Brentai on October 08, 2009, 04:23:01 PM

I'd say burning effigy of Hitler would do it, but that's the wrong war.

What did WWI soldiers care about? Getting better food then D and K rations? Maybe we can honor them by building a four-star restaurant over their graves?

Staying Dry. Never mind the restaurant, build a giant sump pump.

Re: the silly article, Is the cross many years old? Because if it's recent okay, that's a bit silly, but if it actually dates to the war (or the frenzy of monument building after WWII), then I should think everyone should probably just leave it the hell alone and just call it what it is: a case of good intentions from a lesser-informed past.

TA · « **Reply #1439 on:** October 08, 2009, 06:26:22 PM »

A long-standing Constitutional problem is still a Constitutional problem, and just because the Ten Commandments have been on the courthouse doors since the 1700s doesn't make it okay to leave them there.

Especially when petitions to build, say, a Buddhist shrine near the cross have been denied.

News:

Author Topic: What the fuck? (Read 315081 times)