Friend posted twice to half-heartedly defend Kayma, while trying not to look too interested.
I probably should mentioned this earlier, but you've misinterpreted my arguments. In both cases, I was agreeing with them on their original assertions that Kayma did something noteworthy, but I was arguing that their reasoning for do so was flawed.
1) Romosome, who thought it was suspicious that two people jumped on the Friday bandwagon minutes after he voted for her (or so he thought). What I (and everyone else) saw was him thinking that it was suspicious that Kayma seconded his vote. I was just pointing out to Romosome that no, it really isn't that suspicious that someone seconded his vote. The relatively short time in which he did this was suspicious, however. Then Romosome told us how he mistook one vote for another etc etc.
2) When I was arguing against guild, I stated that Kayma did x (x being rush the vote, I guess) and yyler did x. So why did Guild think one was more suspicious than the other when they were essentially identical cases? What I wanted to know was, why did Guild vote the way he did?
Also, why is not switching my vote evidence?
It's not, by itself. Combined with the other things though, it could be interpreted as you trying to avoid drawing attention to yourself by hiding behind a meaningless revenge vote.
Who would you have suggested? Kayma or Romosome? Because I wanted to lynch Romosome, personally. Check page 2 in thread. Newbie votes for Romosome. 2 votes for Romo. I insert argument 1 from above. Go to sleep. Wake up. 4 votes on Romosome, Guild tells people to hold up on the voting until Romo defends self. So I don't. Kayma votes for Romo, leading Guild over to him instead. I insert argument 2. Then everyone starts dogpiling on Kayma (correctly) for being suspicious. I was still holding out for Romosome to defend himself, because I (incorrectly) thought that his silence was like an admission of guilt. When everyone decided to lynch Kayma instead, I realized that not saying anything is a better defence than actually defending yourself. So after Niku voted for me, I shut my mouth. Well, that and Niku didn't say anything to defend myself against, considering he didn't accuse me of anything.
meaningless revenge vote.
[/quote]
Wrong again. While I could see how you would think it was a revenge vote, I actually voted for Transportation because with you voting for Kayma, Transportation was the only person left who hadn't been voted for day 1. I decided to fix that.
TL;DR
If someone votes for you don't defend yourself
Author
Topic: Revenge of Queen Broccoli (Read 14307 times)