Brontoforumus Archive

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:


This board has been fossilized.
You are reading an archive of Brontoforumus, a.k.a. The Worst Forums Ever, from 2008 to early 2014.  Registration and posting (for most members) has been disabled here to discourage spambots from taking over.  Old members can still log in to view boards, PMs, etc.

The new message board is at http://brontoforum.us.

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17

Author Topic: Star Trek  (Read 31555 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Cthulhu-chan

  • Tested
  • Karma: 10
  • Posts: 2036
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #200 on: June 03, 2012, 08:24:26 PM »

Might want to take a second look (though not ready to discredit the vampire claim...).
Logged

Smiler

  • HOM NOM NOM NOM
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: 66
  • Posts: 3334
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #201 on: June 03, 2012, 08:24:48 PM »

Logged

Büge

  • won't give you fleaz
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65304
  • Posts: 10062
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #202 on: June 03, 2012, 08:54:00 PM »

Why'd they swap heads?
Logged

Brentai

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnXYVlPgX_o
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65281
  • Posts: 17524
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #203 on: June 03, 2012, 09:04:30 PM »

So he looks like a thin vampire.
Logged

Smiler

  • HOM NOM NOM NOM
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: 66
  • Posts: 3334
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #204 on: July 17, 2012, 05:30:22 PM »

Quote
Star Trek weapons are actually super weak and solid projectile weapons are really strong. I mean, photon torpedoes? That's basically, like, light torpedoes. Torpedoes made of light. I step outside and the sun is out and I'm like, "photon torpedoes incoming" and then I'm like "raise shields" and put on sun screen and make explosion sounds with my mouth and say "shields holding captain."

 "Very good, Number One, proceed to our coordinates ahead warp factor 5" and I make whooshing noises and hold my arms out like wings
Logged

James Edward Smith

  • CIS male, Albeist Scumbag
  • Tested
  • Karma: 11
  • Posts: 2087
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #205 on: July 17, 2012, 05:42:42 PM »

Who said this?
Logged
Talk? Talk is for lovers, Merlin. I need a sword to be king.

Smiler

  • HOM NOM NOM NOM
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: 66
  • Posts: 3334
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #206 on: July 24, 2012, 06:13:46 AM »

ATTENTION: There is no reason to buy Season 1 blu rays anymore.



Awwwwwwww yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah.
Logged

Cthulhu-chan

  • Tested
  • Karma: 10
  • Posts: 2036
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #207 on: July 24, 2012, 06:49:03 AM »

?
Logged

Smiler

  • HOM NOM NOM NOM
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: 66
  • Posts: 3334
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #208 on: July 24, 2012, 07:21:52 AM »

Season 1 of TNG isn't very good. Some people have been joking that it was totally worth getting the season over again to see that headsplosion in HD.
Logged

Cthulhu-chan

  • Tested
  • Karma: 10
  • Posts: 2036
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #209 on: July 24, 2012, 10:21:27 AM »

Oh.

...don't remember that headshot being so cheesy.
Logged

Mongrel

  • Emoticon Knight-Errant
  • kodePunc Team
  • Tested
  • *
  • Karma: -65340
  • Posts: 17029
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #210 on: July 24, 2012, 11:52:32 AM »

HD is not always a good thing.
Logged

Smiler

  • HOM NOM NOM NOM
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: 66
  • Posts: 3334
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #211 on: September 03, 2012, 08:28:42 PM »

Logged

Büge

  • won't give you fleaz
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65304
  • Posts: 10062
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #212 on: September 07, 2012, 08:22:27 AM »

check out today's Google homepage. :D
Logged

Büge

  • won't give you fleaz
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65304
  • Posts: 10062
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #213 on: September 10, 2012, 03:53:33 PM »

The next film is titled Star Trek Into Darkness.

That's not a typo, by the way.
Logged

Smiler

  • HOM NOM NOM NOM
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: 66
  • Posts: 3334
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #214 on: September 10, 2012, 05:31:07 PM »

Star Trek 2 The Search for Curly's Gold
Logged

Thad

  • Master of Karate and Friendship for Everyone
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65394
  • Posts: 12111
    • View Profile
    • corporate-sellout.com
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #215 on: September 14, 2012, 09:40:53 AM »

There are a few threads this could go in, but I'ma stickin' it here: Mother Jones interview with George Takei.

He continues to be a fun interview and a great guy; this one's mostly about his upcoming musical about Japanese internment (and its origins in him being moved by the end of Act 1 of The Heights).

A good bit about Trek in there, of course, about being closeted in the 1960's and about the importance of a non-stereotypical Asian character on TV.

Quote
My father told me, "Don't do anything that would bring shame to the family." I was always mindful of that. When I told him I wanted to pursue a career as an actor, my father said, "Look at what you see on television at the movies, is that what you want to be doing? Do you want to make a life out of that?" And I said, "Daddy, I'm going to change it."

Fuck yes.

Trek's got an enduring legacy for a lot of reasons, but I think it's fair to say the most important is its role in showing an idealized future where we are better people.  We'll get over the racial discrimination, it said, and the gender biases, and this issue we've got with the Russians right now will be ancient history.  (And sure, maybe we'll fight some Space Russians, but before you know it one of THEM will be on the bridge, too.)
Logged

Smiler

  • HOM NOM NOM NOM
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: 66
  • Posts: 3334
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #216 on: September 14, 2012, 12:14:22 PM »

Chekov was a Russian in Space, and he was even on the bridge.
Logged

TA

  • Tested
  • Karma: 29
  • Posts: 3219
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #217 on: September 14, 2012, 12:16:40 PM »

 :joke:
Logged
Do you understand how terrifying the words “vibrating strap on” are for an asexual? That’s like saying “the holocaust” to a Jew.

Smiler

  • HOM NOM NOM NOM
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: 66
  • Posts: 3334
    • View Profile
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #218 on: September 14, 2012, 12:21:57 PM »

Actually it wasn't.
Logged

Thad

  • Master of Karate and Friendship for Everyone
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65394
  • Posts: 12111
    • View Profile
    • corporate-sellout.com
Re: Star Trek
« Reply #219 on: September 14, 2012, 01:56:58 PM »

Right, Worf is the Space Russian I am referring to.

Because TOS has Chekov, a Russian, being perfectly fine and chummy with the rest of the humans, but doesn't REALLY go beyond the Cold War paranoia because it still uses Klingons as stand-ins for Russians.

But then Next Gen brings it full circle by having Klingons join the Federation.  And, it bears noting, this is BEFORE the Berlin Wall came down, so that's pretty visionary stuff.

THAT'S the point.  Not a joke, exactly, but the point.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16 17