New to this particular forum, but some people seem to be taking for granted that there is universal and easy access to abortion in states as awful as utah: this is wrong. The vast majority of counties in utah do not have any abortion providers, and there are a grand total of six in the entire state.
This translates into 55% of utah's women lacking reasonable access to abortion, unless you define "traveling 50 to 100 miles to get to a clinic, leaving out all of the other bullshit you need to do" as reasonable access. If your contention is that abortion is preferable to back alley methods, you'd be better served expanding access to abortion in these theocratic backwater states.
Additionally, as many other people have discussed, unless you can prove that a fetus feels pain at any point prior to the legal limits of abortion there is absolutely no moral difference between an induced miscarriage and an abortion. Beyond that, half of all pregnancies and 15-20% of all realized/recognized pregnancies end in miscarriage naturally; are you comfortable with the implications of criminalizing a naturally occurring and to some degree uncontrollable phenomenon?
Finally, we can't even reliably determine motive, as if that should matter. Teenagers believe, in significant numbers, that bleach prevents HIV and/or pregnancy; now you need to prove that a given woman both knew she was pregnant and drank bleach (for example) in an effort to terminate that pregnancy, rather than some other misguided reasoning. All of this so that we can punish poor, uneducated women for having sex or being unlucky; is it worth it?