Brontoforumus Archive

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:


This board has been fossilized.
You are reading an archive of Brontoforumus, a.k.a. The Worst Forums Ever, from 2008 to early 2014.  Registration and posting (for most members) has been disabled here to discourage spambots from taking over.  Old members can still log in to view boards, PMs, etc.

The new message board is at http://brontoforum.us.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10

Author Topic: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)  (Read 11546 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Friday

  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65374
  • Posts: 5122
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #60 on: July 30, 2010, 06:41:25 PM »

 :itsatrap:
Logged

McDohl

  • Pika-boo
  • Tested
  • Karma: 27
  • Posts: 4379
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #61 on: July 30, 2010, 06:47:38 PM »

I'm tellin' ya.  You're gonna use that thing on me, all :8D: and then Kazz is gonna be all "lol innocent  :itsmagic: " and you're gonna be all  :painful:  and then I'm gonna be all  :rolleyes: and then when night rolls around I'm gonna be all  :endit:  where the gun is actually werewolves
Logged

Beat Bandit

  • be entranced by my sexy rhythm
  • High-Bullshit
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65418
  • Posts: 4293
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #62 on: July 30, 2010, 07:15:48 PM »

You know that emote is "old man dies, young girl lives" right? I'm the young girl.
Logged

Kazz

  • Projekt Direktor
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65475
  • Posts: 6423
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #63 on: July 30, 2010, 07:27:07 PM »

Rule clarification:

Someone who is revived by the Necromancer may use his once-per-game ability again.
Logged

Disposable Ninja

  • Tested
  • Karma: -65447
  • Posts: 4529
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #64 on: July 30, 2010, 07:38:05 PM »

I think we should find out what teams our scryers are playing for. I can accept that there would be two scryers in a game who're innocent, but three innocent scryers is stretching it for me. Especially since one of them was added after the game began. I'm with Friday: Newbie, I think you should Scry either yourself, McDohl or Fowl.
Logged

Friend

  • Meow see here..
  • Tested
  • Karma: 4
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #65 on: July 30, 2010, 07:50:24 PM »

Our best course of action would be to have jsnlxdnrlv use his scry on fowl. The detective role almost probably be the most dangerous wolf role, and we can never really trust whether he is lying to us or not unless we prove it with a public scry.
Logged

McDohl

  • Pika-boo
  • Tested
  • Karma: 27
  • Posts: 4379
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #66 on: July 30, 2010, 07:57:59 PM »

I tend to agree with Friend.
Logged

Beat Bandit

  • be entranced by my sexy rhythm
  • High-Bullshit
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65418
  • Posts: 4293
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #67 on: July 30, 2010, 08:03:54 PM »

You're being so dumb that my face hurts. Also, though it relieves me that now that Friend is barking along with McDohl that means Friday may actually not be a wolf, it also means we have a ninja wolf.

McDohl if you honestly believe that if you were innocent it wouldn't be in your best interests for your side to be able to trust you, then you're an idiot. I've talked to you enough to know you're not an idiot. The only option left is horrible liar.
Logged

jsnlxndrlv

  • Custom Title
  • Tested
  • Karma: 24
  • Posts: 2913
    • View Profile
    • Website title
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #68 on: July 30, 2010, 08:10:33 PM »

Oh, hey. Cool.

Fowl: I will stop voting for you once you post your list. It's that simple.
Logged
Signature:
Signatures are displayed at the bottom of each post or personal message. BBCode and smileys may be used in your signature.

Friend

  • Meow see here..
  • Tested
  • Karma: 4
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #69 on: July 30, 2010, 08:12:43 PM »

I say public scrying you is a good idea. I give (from my perspective) a pretty good reason. You disagree. Your reason? Because I'm dumb. Also I'm a wolf I guess. Brilliant defense, chum.
Logged

Kazz

  • Projekt Direktor
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65475
  • Posts: 6423
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #70 on: July 30, 2010, 08:13:38 PM »

Oh, hey. Cool.

Fowl: I will stop voting for you once you post your list. It's that simple.

he posted it.  he just did it in the midst of prose.
Logged

Friend

  • Meow see here..
  • Tested
  • Karma: 4
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #71 on: July 30, 2010, 08:17:07 PM »

McDohl if you honestly believe that if you were innocent it wouldn't be in your best interests for your side to be able to trust you, then you're an idiot. I've talked to you enough to know you're not an idiot. The only option left is horrible liar.
This argument also applies to you
Logged

jsnlxndrlv

  • Custom Title
  • Tested
  • Karma: 24
  • Posts: 2913
    • View Profile
    • Website title
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #72 on: July 30, 2010, 08:18:13 PM »

Oh, okay. I'm a little drunk. Vote rescinded.
Logged
Signature:
Signatures are displayed at the bottom of each post or personal message. BBCode and smileys may be used in your signature.

Beat Bandit

  • be entranced by my sexy rhythm
  • High-Bullshit
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65418
  • Posts: 4293
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #73 on: July 30, 2010, 08:30:11 PM »

Well, I already made this point, and Friday supported it, but I guess if you need to hear it yet again from the mouth of the person you don't trust to uh... trust it then... wait a minute, weren't you trying to say how you weren't stupid?

Okay, let's go over it again:

- I state that McDohl came up as a wolf in my scrying.

- McDohl freaks out and says the best way to prove that he's innocent is that we kill someone innocent (after trying to vote for me without providing anything even resembling a reason).

- I point out that even though McDohl came up as a wolf since it's not definite and risking killing an inno seer is not even kind of worth it, so we should lynch someone that has a 2/3rds chance of being a wolf and wouldn't be a major inno loss if it's wrong.

- Suddenly we have the ability to see if one of our seers is definitely innocent. Since there's a 2/3rds chance Dohl is a wolf and no reason for anyone to think I am right now barring paranoia, Friday submits that Dohl is the best target.

- I agree with Friday.

- Dohl freaks out again and while he was trying to put together a clear post defining why we shouldn't waste the ability on him, he ends up spewing emote nonsense.

- D.N. does a good job of not looking like a wolf and agrees that Dohl is a good choice for the power, but adds that I am, too.

- Friend decides "Fuck Dohl, Fowl is the one we need to scry". Almost like he has a way of knowing definitively what side Dohl is on and not wanting it to be revealed.

- Dohl, still unable to defend himself, joyfully fellates D.N. and Friend in agreement.

- ???

- PROFIT!
Logged

Friend

  • Meow see here..
  • Tested
  • Karma: 4
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #74 on: July 30, 2010, 08:45:43 PM »

I'll grant that it seems likely at this point that Mcdohl is a wolf, and if he is publicly scried and turns out to be a wolf, that I will probably look suspicious. You will also probably be exonerated and no one will suspect you of being a wolf. Which was the wolves' plan the entire time.

This might sounds crazy as hell, but imagine this scenario: Two seer wolves at the beginning of the game. They plot to kill one and prove the other innocent, who will lead on the innocents for the rest of the game. It especially makes sense when you take into account the fact that the one seer being exonerated can blame lynching an innocent on his faulty scry. Now that we manage to get a one shot public scry, you want to use it to reinforce the idea that Mcdohl is a wolf, and get rid of the other scry, making sure no one will be able to scry you, the wolf behind the scenes.
Logged

Beat Bandit

  • be entranced by my sexy rhythm
  • High-Bullshit
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65418
  • Posts: 4293
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #75 on: July 30, 2010, 08:48:28 PM »

Well, actually I would say that if we do this to McDohl and he's innocent, he could indisputably prove me innocent tonight if I survived it.

Interesting that now that I've finally provided an argument that seems to have convinced you that the public scry will be used on McDohl that you instantly turn around and expect him to be a wolf, though.
Logged

Friend

  • Meow see here..
  • Tested
  • Karma: 4
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #76 on: July 30, 2010, 09:02:34 PM »

Well, actually I would say that if we do this to McDohl and he's innocent, he could indisputably prove me innocent tonight if I survived it
I... did not actually think about that.

Interesting that now that I've finally provided an argument that seems to have convinced you that the public scry will be used on McDohl that you instantly turn around and expect him to be a wolf, though.

I never said he was innocent. I already explained that I assumed that you two were working together to get rid of any seer types by throwing Mcdohl under the bus, as I explained earlier in my crazy conspiracy theoryâ„¢
Logged

jsnlxndrlv

  • Custom Title
  • Tested
  • Karma: 24
  • Posts: 2913
    • View Profile
    • Website title
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #77 on: July 30, 2010, 09:11:45 PM »

For the sake of moving things along, I'm gonna prestige McDohl.
Logged
Signature:
Signatures are displayed at the bottom of each post or personal message. BBCode and smileys may be used in your signature.

Kazz

  • Projekt Direktor
  • Admin
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65475
  • Posts: 6423
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #78 on: July 30, 2010, 09:17:22 PM »

McDohl is innocent.
Logged

Beat Bandit

  • be entranced by my sexy rhythm
  • High-Bullshit
  • Tested
  • Karma: -65418
  • Posts: 4293
    • View Profile
Re: Public Enemies #1 (Game Thread)
« Reply #79 on: July 30, 2010, 09:19:42 PM »

<Rygaron> This wolf game is ridiculous.
<Rygaron> Either all the wolves are making themselves terribly obvious, or the innos are being so dumb they can hide without a worry.

Well at least now I know which it is.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10