You know, I wouldn't mind lunching Guild either just because of his sheer volume of posts, but your explanation is lacking to me. I don't see why revealing private conversations is a problem, nor do I see where Guild endagers people he knows
I'm not posting on my phone anymore.
To finish my point, I don't see where Guild endangers people he knows to be innocent, because you haven't established how Guild
knew that the players he endangered were innocent.
Anyways...
Killing Guild would actually reveal some new information as his pattern has been quite consistent. So a verdict of innocent/evil would exonerate/indict several people. Worst possibility is a turned and that still means we can parse Day 1 as inno.
Essentially, this is the largest lead we have unless someone wants to start dropping their own private conversations.
So anyway Guild as I'd say we have a large enough honeypot for either result.
You know, you make a good point.
However, lynching Guild is not our only lead. Everyone seems to have forgotten that Kazz was NOT a turned vigilante. If I had the mindset of a wolf or vampire on day 3, I would vote for Kazz, since he wouldn't be on my team. I would have to assume he would either an innocent, or on the other team. Which also means that both sides had a pretty big incentive to kill Kazz, seeing as how he was basically a walking timebomb. Of course, Guild also happens to be one of the people who voted for Kazz, but I'm just saying we do have other avenues open to us.
So we're getting rid of Guild because his play style strikes you as dumb or because you think he's actually evil? Open question!
Honestly, it's how he throws out some twist or a new plot development every several posts that completely baffles me and leaves me wondering what the hell is happening. Some people, I might suspect of being innocent or a wolf/vampire. Him, honestly, I have no fucking clue.