Topic: Closed Werewolf Epsilon - Serial Killer Lottel Wins (Read 18027 times)

Nickasummers · « **Reply #40 on:** August 20, 2011, 01:05:24 PM »

Three votes before he can even respond? My, what sharp teeth you all have. Maybe he is a wolf, but even pirates give someone a chance to say their piece before making them walk th' plank.

Lottel - 1 - (Caithness)
Nickasummers - 1 - (Classic)
Caithness - 3 - (Lottel, NexAdruin, Ardus)

Caithness · « **Reply #41 on:** August 20, 2011, 01:26:31 PM »

Quote from: Lottel on August 20, 2011, 12:08:58 PM

Ok. I'm voting Caithness because picking apart sentences are a good thing until you go crazy about it and stop reading the damn sentence.

And while being incredibly annoying may be a crime on Day 1, since he didn't do that last game at all and was inno last game, I'm thinking he's wolfy.

So what meaning do you attribute to Classic's statement? I had hoped we were moving beyond the meaningless jokes phase of the day.

My vote for you, for example, was a joke, but now that I've seen you jump to Classic's defense with reasoning I don't understand, it makes me suspicious that you're wolf-buddies with him.

And if you'd like an example of me picking apart someone's post last game, how about this one?

NexAdruin · « **Reply #42 on:** August 20, 2011, 01:33:10 PM »

I assumed, as I'm sure Classic meant to say, that he was talking about lynching. Unless you want to believe a wolf would be stupid enough to say "I kill people once a day."

NexAdruin · « **Reply #43 on:** August 20, 2011, 01:34:12 PM »

Also, your picking apart posts currently has nothing to do with logic as it did in that example. You're just being nitpicky about everything anyone says.

Lottel · « **Reply #44 on:** August 20, 2011, 01:35:21 PM »

Quote from: Caithness on August 20, 2011, 01:26:31 PM

Quote from: Lottel on August 20, 2011, 12:08:58 PM
Ok. I'm voting Caithness because picking apart sentences are a good thing until you go crazy about it and stop reading the damn sentence.

And while being incredibly annoying may be a crime on Day 1, since he didn't do that last game at all and was inno last game, I'm thinking he's wolfy.

So what meaning do you attribute to Classic's statement? I had hoped we were moving beyond the meaningless jokes phase of the day.

When are we ever beyond meaningless jokes?

Quote

My vote for you, for example, was a joke, but now that I've seen you jump to Classic's defense with reasoning I don't understand, it makes me suspicious that you're wolf-buddies with him.

And I knew it was a joke. And I'm not jumping to anyone's defense. It's day one and your posts annoy me and struck me as different then you acted as an innocent last game. I don't care who you are talking about. I'd say to stop seeing teams where there are none, but I can guess that's a bit understandable seeing as you are obviously trying to make up from last game. Sorry.

Quote

And if you'd like an example of me picking apart someone's post last game, how about this one?

But not every other post.

Lottel · « **Reply #45 on:** August 20, 2011, 01:35:52 PM »

Also what Nex said.

Nickasummers · « **Reply #46 on:** August 20, 2011, 01:55:06 PM »

Quote from: NexAdruin on August 20, 2011, 01:34:12 PM

Also, your picking apart posts currently has nothing to do with logic as it did in that example. You're just being nitpicky about everything anyone says.

That makes me feel like his response may have been a desperate.

Quote from: Caithness on August 20, 2011, 01:26:31 PM

My vote for you, for example, was a joke, but now that I've seen you jump to Classic's defense with reasoning I don't understand, it makes me suspicious that you're wolf-buddies with him.

And, assuming my first feeling is true, that would make this quote an attempt to deflect negative attention.

That said,

Quote from: Lottel on August 20, 2011, 01:35:21 PM

It's day one and your posts annoy me and struck me as different then you acted as an innocent last game.

I have great respect for consistency and the information gained by looking at it, or at a lack of it. This right here is the final nail in the coffin.

Given the risk of sudden lynches when there is one vote left, especially when we don't know what roles exist, I am going to wait to vote until I get back to college. I don't have an exact time but it should be at least a few hours. If nothing has convinced me that Caith is not the most suspicious by then, I will place my vote regardless of whether or not it is the lynchvote.

Caithness · « **Reply #47 on:** August 20, 2011, 02:02:08 PM »

Quote from: NexAdruin on August 20, 2011, 01:33:10 PM

I assumed, as I'm sure Classic meant to say, that he was talking about lynching. Unless you want to believe a wolf would be stupid enough to say "I kill people once a day."

Oh. That does make a lot more sense.

Still, I'm going to change my vote to Classic anyway. He's got the lowest post count beside Envy and Kayma, two people who would understandably be shy after getting lynched last game.

I don't expect you to move your vote off me in return, Lottel, even thought that would be appreciated. And I'll try to ease off on the picking of nits.

Kayma · « **Reply #48 on:** August 20, 2011, 02:21:37 PM »

So Caithness, what awesome power do you have that we shouldn't lynch away?

Caithness · « **Reply #49 on:** August 20, 2011, 02:29:34 PM »

Well, I was planning on waiting until I had 4 votes against me to reveal, but since you asked...

Remember last game how when someone died their role was revealed? That won't happen in this game if I die. A pretty safe power to claim, I know, since the only way to verify it is to kill me, but it's all I've got.

I'm guessing Guild liked the idea when he saw Nickasummers claim to have the power here, and decided to use it as an actual role this game.

Nickasummers · « **Reply #50 on:** August 20, 2011, 02:44:02 PM »

For the record, that WAS part of my role last game. I didn't make that up.

Classic - 1 - (Caithness)
Nickasummers - 1 - (Classic)
Caithness - 3 - (Lottel, NexAdruin, Ardus)

Caithness · « **Reply #51 on:** August 20, 2011, 02:53:21 PM »

Oh, then I guess Guild just forgot to include it in the list of role PMs at the end.

Nickasummers · « **Reply #52 on:** August 20, 2011, 03:13:56 PM »

Go back and reread it, it is there.
In any case, I don't understand why you would admit to that power if it were true. And considering It was effectively a disadvantage attached to my vote-swap power for balance, I don't see any chance that that could be your only power, which means you either a) made it up, or b) aren't telling us the positive part of your power.
That said, I don't want to hear the positive part of your power unless you are doomed to die if you don't reveal it. That only helps the wolves.

Nickasummers · « **Reply #53 on:** August 20, 2011, 03:15:21 PM »

Just to clarify, when i say disadvantage I mean that it provides no value to the holder, but it makes them fear death more greatly than even a wolf does.

Caithness · « **Reply #54 on:** August 20, 2011, 03:26:32 PM »

Okay, well then I guess I just can't read as well as I thought I could.

Caithness · « **Reply #55 on:** August 20, 2011, 03:42:03 PM »

Quote from: Nickasummers on August 20, 2011, 03:13:56 PM

In any case, I don't understand why you would admit to that power if it were true.

The same reason you did: an attempt to save my life. Even if I'm not lynched I might still be a target for the wolves, if they don't want roles revealed on death, but hopefully the Baner will protect me. If there is one.

Nickasummers · « **Reply #56 on:** August 20, 2011, 07:31:38 PM »

Well, now would be the time I would vote to lynch you, but at this point I have enough of a gut feeling that you are innocent that I am afraid to. You are currently number 1 on my list of suspicious people, but I am inclined to wait on lynching you for the moment. I think you are lying about being responsible for role reveal on death, but it would be an excellent cover for an equally important role. It gives us a reason to not lynch you, and a reason for the baner to protect you, without actually revealing even the existence of your true role.

Classic · « **Reply #57 on:** August 20, 2011, 07:55:29 PM »

I dunno, this lie seems so blatant and crazy that I can't believe it's anything but the desperation of a baddie. That said, last game I was basically a giant nerf to the innocents. And if not for the fact that he hasn't broken any Laws I'd say he needs to go.

Guild · « **Reply #58 on:** August 21, 2011, 09:29:12 AM »

Votecount 3 - Day 1

Classic - 1 - (Caithness)
Nickasummers - 1 - (Classic)
Caithness - 3 - (Lottel, NexAdruin, Ardus)

With 8 alive it's 5 to lynch.

Classic · « **Reply #59 on:** August 21, 2011, 09:50:38 AM »

So the "good" news, is that, at the very least, our bads aren't interested in presenting a unified front to off Caithness. That's almost useful information.

News:

Author Topic: Closed Werewolf Epsilon - Serial Killer Lottel Wins (Read 18027 times)