Alright, I'm back from my errands. I vote for Disposable Ninja. Kazz's outing of him could be read several ways. Frustration at the game and/or DN's choice of actions and ragequitting, Incrimination of a random non-wolf using his newfound complete lack of credibility for reverse psychology, or to move suspicion off of DN with double reverse psychology thinking that we would assume he can't be trusted and thus bringing attention off of DN with his dying breath. Any of the above would be completely in character for him.
Examining DN on his own merits, let's go back to the beginning of today. Classic's play put the scum in a really, really rough spot. They were already weakened, and face two lynch votes on the same day. If I were them, I would figure the safest thing to do would be to try to distance themselves from the lightsaber vote period. It should be noted that Kazz didn't attempt to bring suspicion onto and saber-vote for Bleck until after he was already accused and had 6-8 votes on him as a desperation measure. Others that spoke of the saber vote without placing a vote were Syl and DN. Syl placed a lynch vote before a saber vote, which makes no sense for an innocent and is odd. However, DN spoke *twice* of how Kazz's death was a forgone conclusion without actually voting himself. Why would he not place a vote to help the death of scum unless he was scum himself? And ignore my post asking why the non-vote in his second post today was ambiguous? Putting tags on something like that without actually doing anything could be argued either way after the fact.
Come on, this one is obvious. Half of you wanted to lynch him day one anyway!