Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Stush]

If he wanted to get out of the game, he could just quit, people have already done it. Maybe he's trying to be so obvious that we just brush it aside.

[Classic]

That's pretty mad.
My current theory is that he's some kind of secret fool role. Unless Dizzy has a history of being a horrendous whiner that I've forgotten about. Anyway, it's time for my constitutional, these malty calories aren't going to burn themselves.

[Caithness]

If Defenestration doesn't want to be the first person to cast a vote for Stush, then I'll do it for him.

[Stush]

Voting for me would be pretty silly! Unless you're not on our side, of course!

[Bongo Bill]

I will kill anybody who tells me that they don't want to play any more, or who goes a full day and night without interacting with the game (including privately). All players are expected to try to win; if you don't want to win, then say so and I will kill you. Anybody I kill in this way will lose, regardless of their stated victory condition.

There are no secret roles.

[Caithness]

Voting for me would be pretty silly! Unless you're not on our side, of course!

Ah, but whose side is "our side"?

[jsnlxndrlv]

Today, I vote for the first person to respond to the thread... so, Defenestration, you're it. (Also my phone can't reach google docs.)

[Zaratustra]

I'm reviewing Dizzy's posts and it seems he's asking to be lynched, then accusing everyone that votes for him to be lynched of being EBIL.

Very well. I call your bluff. Dizzy.

[Stush]

I will kill anybody who tells me that they don't want to play any more, or who goes a full day and night without interacting with the game (including privately). All players are expected to try to win; if you don't want to win, then say so and I will kill you. Anybody I kill in this way will lose, regardless of their stated victory condition.

There are no secret roles.

Bongo isn't talking about in the game here, he will hunt you down and kill you in real life, and wear your head as a hat.

[Stush]

I sort of want to vote for dizzy, because I can't really see any reason why someone would deliberately want to get themselves lynched. Is there any way that can be used as part of some kind of evil plan?

[Defenestration]

If Defenestration doesn't want to be the first person to cast a vote for Stush, then I'll do it for him.

I was waiting for his reply to explain his inevitably shitty logic as a gesture of goodwill. Since he just out and ignored me, I will definately vote for Stush.

At the same time, I think Dizzy needs to die upon further reflection as well. If he's the weretiger, he needs to be dead. If he's a vanilla inno, he's an obvious turn target now if we leave him be and thus also needs to die if he refuses to participate. However, Stush's wolfy logic takes precedence imo.

We still need to hear from McDohl and Lottel as well.

[Kayma]

This Dizzy thing is absurd. I will never knowingly vote for him. Enjoy your long life, Dizzy.

[gahitsu]

I'm super fucking irritated with Dizzy right now. And last night I was all ready to come out swinging on Stush for being an unbearable twit.

[gahitsu]

Hey where the fuck has Dohl been? I know he mentioned work but you'd think he'd at least step in to make some counter weretiger claims or something.

[Dizzy]

This Dizzy thing is absurd. I will never knowingly vote for him. Enjoy your long life, Dizzy.

I shall! =D

[Bleck]

The fuck that nobody is voting for gahitsu is baffling.

[Envy]

Stush is being Crazy, but so is Defenestration.

[Stush]

If Defenestration doesn't want to be the first person to cast a vote for Stush, then I'll do it for him.

I was waiting for his reply to explain his inevitably shitty logic as a gesture of goodwill. Since he just out and ignored me, I will definately vote for Stush.

Firstly,  I didn't ignore you, I replied soon after.

Hey, just because I'm not a fan of lynching innocent people doesn't mean I won't try to help avoid us all becoming meals for monsters. It's just that there doesn't really seem to be any patterns or anything behind who gets lynched or who doesn't. This early on, you may as well just be throwing dice, it seems.

I agree with you that the silent people might be a problem, but their silence might be a lack of enthusiasm, as well.

So either you totally missed that, or you're deliberately making stuff up to try make me seem more suspicious.

Secondly, what logic was there to explain? I just don't like lynching innocent people, I'm sorry if I was supposed to just be all "Hell yeah, let's lynch all of the innocents!", But that's not really my style.

I get the impression that you're trying to rile people up to go after me, so I'm going to have to vote for you, Defenestration

[Defenestration]

Hey, just because I'm not a fan of lynching innocent people doesn't mean I won't try to help avoid us all becoming meals for monsters. It's just that there doesn't really seem to be any patterns or anything behind who gets lynched or who doesn't. This early on, you may as well just be throwing dice, it seems.

I agree with you that the silent people might be a problem, but their silence might be a lack of enthusiasm, as well.

No, I saw this Stush. You didn't explain anything, and thus ignored me. That's nice that you don't want to hurt innocents, but you didn't give an alternate explanation as to your strategy to avoid doing this or explain any logic behind it. Good feelings and camaraderie don't kill wolfpires, logic, strategy, and cunning do.

If pointing out the logical fallacy in wholeheartedly rejecting reason for an emotional appeal makes me suspicious, then I don't know what to tell you.

[Friend]

I'm going to have to agree with Defenestration on this.

When I saw this post:

We're getting pretty good at this lynching thing! If we keep killing the innocents at least it'll be easier to hit the werewolves and vampires later on!

*Golf clap*

I was planning on giving you a break because of what you said later:

Hey, just because I'm not a fan of lynching innocent people doesn't mean I won't try to help avoid us all becoming meals for monsters. It's just that there doesn't really seem to be any patterns or anything behind who gets lynched or who doesn't. This early on, you may as well just be throwing dice, it seems.

I agree with you that the silent people might be a problem, but their silence might be a lack of enthusiasm, as well.

I kinda agree here! This made up for you implying that we were aiming to lynch innocents.
Of course, with this next post you come out and admit that you think we're trying to kill innocents:

Secondly, what logic was there to explain? I just don't like lynching innocent people, I'm sorry if I was supposed to just be all "Hell yeah, let's lynch all of the innocents!", But that's not really my style.

This is a strawman. None of us (well, most of us) aren't trying to lynch innocents. No one said we wanted to kill innocents. We have, however, admitted that there will be innocent casualties when using the lynch. This is mostly unavoidable as a result of the uninformed nature of the town. We've brought this up already. You're either missing the point, or just being intentionally obtuse. Stush.